You’re getting on my wick now mate. Your first post is BUGGER ALL like the most recent ones and you say WE’VE misunderstood you... Read it again - you come over like a real patronising muppet! Especially when you say QUOTE “Ladies try to style - BLESS”
Next You’re now saying that Andy didn’t answer your questions yet 3/4 posts ago you thanked him for his comments!?! Why didn’t you pick him up then?
You talk about CBL a-la New York - but BY DEFINITION NY is on TWO and to be frank is a CRAP FAD of salsa used because the clubs get so full there’s no room for anything else except for linear movements.
Any idiot can teach CBL style ’cause al they do is go back an forth, back and forth. Turn here, turn there, back and forth. It’s predictable and rather limited, (watch Dean Maynards videos if you don’t believe me) plus, it’s easy and THAT’s WHY so many teachers and pupils love to do it... 'Cause they can get good in a quicker period of time. The skill comes when (like Steve / Andy) you can dance a routine WITHOUT a CBL.
Now you’re challanging me to explain the multiple variations on a CBL that I’ve been shown.
This is compounded by the fact you can do a CBL so you may think they’re all SIMPLE VARIATIONS on the same thing, but to someone who is NEW they are not the same, they are VERY DIFFERENT! One CBL can be led with a pull, One with a push, one letting the lady walk on her own steam, One from a mambo, one from an open hold, blah blah blah. As a beginner who has more than enough to concentrate on when learning salsa - what the hell do you do when confronted with every teacher saying... “this is how you do a CBL” and then doing something TOTALLY different to what a previous teacher taught...
A dfferent analogy - think of learning a foreign language - you learn one word - “Television”. But the first person you meet calls it a “TV” and the second calls it “the box”, the third calls it the “tele”, the fourth “the small screen” - OVERLOAD! Sure - when you’re comfortable you can learn all of these but when your new you just call it a “television”.
This is why having a carbon copy of ANDY’s SALSA STYLE would be good as they would all teach the same thing, (speak the same language) ergo... NO CONFUSION at beginner level (although I admit Advanced would be dull).
I have tried to listen and understand all the points you’ve made and my comments have always been aimed to enlighten and possible resolve some of your “attack” - and I think I’ve managed to do so with good humour. Now it appears that you are simply trying to play Devil’s advocate changing your “tactics / comments” to suit you whenever someone successfully counters your point and are doing nothing more than winding me (and I expect others) right up the wrong way. I’d LOVE to know who you are to simply see if you’re as good as your comments / criticisms imply!
To be frank - I am bored of you now so will no longer be posting. (I’m sure Hugh will be relieved)
One closing point about Carbon Copies of Andy... A couple of posts (including mine) have mentioned Paul Gordon-Smith who was a phenominally popular teacher in Cardiff 2/3 years ago and was the advanced teacher at the Toad - he taught me a heck of a lot and has probabily had some influence on 90% of Cardiff dancers. He and Andy were as different as Chalk / Cheese, yet Paul was one of Andy’s origional salsa pupils and Andy taught him salsa from scratch! Stick that in your Pipe!